Websites11 min read

Who Owns the Source Code in an Agency Project? (Singapore, 2026)

Mohamed Bah·Fondateur, Kolonell
September 12, 2026
Share:
Who Owns the Source Code in an Agency Project? (Singapore, 2026)

Who Owns the Source Code in an Agency Project? (Singapore, 2026)

Websites

The verdict in three sentences

Under copyright law, code belongs to its creator by default: paying for the work does not automatically transfer the rights. To truly own it, require a full assignment of economic rights on delivery and payment, plus a Git repository in your name from sprint 1. Otherwise you become locked in and a takeover can cost 15-30 % of the original budget in audit and reverse-engineering.

Ownership models and price impact

ModelWhat you getPrice impact
Full rights assignment100 % ownership, code + docs+0 to +10 %
Usage licenceRight to use, no ownership-5 to -15 %
Shared / agency componentsLimited use, dependencyvariable
Open source (base)Free per licenceneutral
SaaS / subscriptionNo code ownershiprecurring
EscrowConditional access (bankruptcy...)+2 to +5 %

Reversibility clauses and checklist

Contractual itemWhy it is critical
Rights assignment on deliveryMakes you owner of the code
Git repo in the client's namePermanent access to source code
Technical documentation deliveredTakeover by a third party possible
Transfer of access and secretsOperational autonomy
Code escrowProtection if the provider fails
Non-dependency clauseBans blocking proprietary components
Handover periodOrderly transition (2-4 weeks)

Cost of a takeover code audit

Project sizeTakeover audit (EUR ex. VAT)Timeline
Small (< 20k lines)3,000 - 6,0001-2 weeks
Medium (20-80k lines)7,000 - 15,0002-4 weeks
Large (> 80k lines)18,000 - 40,0004-8 weeks
No documentation+30 to +50 %+50 % time
Exotic / non-standard stack+20 to +40 %+30 % time

Mini case study

Need a professional website?

Kolonell builds websites that attract clients, optimized for the Sénégalese market. Free quote in 2 minutes.

Prefer a call back?

Leave your WhatsApp number and a Kolonell expert will get back to you within 1 business day. Free, no strings attached.

O. Ndiaye, head of a services SME in Singapore, wants to switch agencies after 2 years. His original contract only granted a usage licence: he owns neither the Git repo nor the documentation. The takeover forces a 12,000 EUR ex. VAT code audit and 4 weeks of reverse-engineering, about 22 % of the original 55,000 EUR budget. A simple full-assignment clause, negotiated upfront for +5 % (2,750 EUR), would have avoided that cost.

FAQ

If I pay, is the code automatically mine? No. Under copyright, the creator keeps economic rights unless there is a written, explicit assignment. A paid invoice is not enough to make you the owner.

What is the difference between assignment and licence? Assignment transfers ownership and the right to modify, resell or take the code elsewhere; a licence only grants a controlled right to use. For independence, require assignment.

What is code escrow? A deposit of the code with a trusted third party, released if certain conditions occur (bankruptcy, service shutdown). It protects without transferring day-to-day ownership.

How do I avoid provider lock-in? Git repo in your name, delivered documentation, access transfer and a non-dependency clause banning blocking proprietary components. Test reversibility before the contract ends.

Is assignment expensive? No, often 0-10 % of the price if negotiated upfront. That is far less than the 15-30 % audit and takeover cost incurred when locked in.

Let's scope your project. Tell us whether you want full assignment, escrow or a takeover of existing code and we'll frame the clauses and any audit. Detailed quote within 48 h. WhatsApp +221 77 596 93 33.

Tags:#code ownership#rights assignment#escrow#provider lock-in#reversibility#contract#code audit#development quote
Share:

Mohamed Bah

Fondateur, Kolonell

Passionate about digital and entrepreneurship in Africa, Mohamed has been helping Sénégalese businesses with their digital transformation since 2020. Founder of Kolonell, he believes every SME deserves a professional and accessible online présence.