The verdict in three sentences
For a mid-sized company with 12 sites that collects around 400 ESRS indicators in spreadsheets, the real risk is not the reporting itself but the audit trail the statutory auditor will demand during assurance. An off-the-shelf CSRD software (15,000 to 60,000 EUR per year) works if your processes are standard, while a custom platform (50,000 to 100,000 EUR excl. VAT, 2026 order of magnitude) pays off as soon as your sites have heterogeneous data sources and their own validation flows. Either way, allow 4 to 6 months before a first reliable collection campaign.
Why spreadsheets no longer survive a CSRD audit
The sustainability director of a multi-site company in Amsterdam receives Excel files from 12 site managers every quarter: energy consumption, waste tonnage, training hours, workplace accidents, purchases by category. Each file has its own version, its own formulas and its own typing errors. The day the auditor asks where the 4,812 MWh reported for the Rotterdam plant comes from, nobody can rebuild the exact path.
The CSRD requires limited assurance on sustainability information, which means proving the origin, calculation method and validation of every data point. Typical sticking points:
| Auditor checkpoint | With spreadsheets | With a dedicated platform |
|---|---|---|
| Data origin (invoice, meter, ERP) | Often lost after copy-paste | Supporting document attached to the entry |
| Change history | Missing or partial | Time-stamped log per user |
| Site manager validation | An email saying OK | Workflow with status and sign-off |
| Emission factors used | Vary from site to site | Central versioned reference library |
| Group consolidation | 2 to 3 weeks of rework | Automatic calculation in minutes |
| Time spent per campaign | 25 to 40 person-days | 8 to 15 person-days (estimate) |
For 400 indicators and 12 sites, that is close to 4,800 data points per reporting year. At that volume, a spreadsheet is no longer a tool but a risk of a qualified opinion.
Off-the-shelf software or custom platform: the numbers
The European CSRD software market took shape in 2025 and 2026. SaaS solutions cover standard ESRS well, but charge per entity, per module or per user. A custom platform costs more in year one and much less afterwards.
| Criterion | Off-the-shelf CSRD software | Custom platform |
|---|---|---|
| Initial cost | 5,000 to 20,000 EUR of configuration | 50,000 to 100,000 EUR excl. VAT of development |
| Recurring cost | 15,000 to 60,000 EUR per year | 6,000 to 15,000 EUR per year (hosting, maintenance) |
| Cumulative 5-year cost | 80,000 to 320,000 EUR | 80,000 to 175,000 EUR |
| Fit with your 12 sites | Limited to built-in options | Forms and flows specific to each site |
| ERP, BMS, payroll connections | Standard connectors, often paid | Integrations built for your systems |
| Time to go live | 2 to 4 months | 4 to 6 months |
| Data and code ownership | With the vendor | With you |
The choice depends mainly on three measurable factors: the number of data sources to connect (beyond 4 or 5 different systems, custom wins), how specific your double materiality assessment is, and the number of contributing users (licences add up fast when 60 people enter data).
What the platform must include to pass the audit
A useful CSRD collection platform comes down to five building blocks. The first is an indicator library aligned with the ESRS datapoints selected after your double materiality assessment, with definition, unit, method and owner. The second is a per-site entry form showing only the relevant indicators, with consistency checks (a 300 % jump in electricity use triggers an alert). The third is a validation workflow with two or three levels: contributor, site manager, sustainability team. The fourth is the audit trail: every value keeps its supporting document, author, date and successive versions. The fifth is the export to your sustainability report drafting tool and to the format expected for ESEF tagging.
| Development work package | Estimated effort | Share of budget |
|---|---|---|
| Scoping, double materiality, data model | 3 to 4 weeks | 12 % |
| Indicator library and entry forms | 5 to 7 weeks | 25 % |
| Validation workflow and audit trail | 4 to 6 weeks | 22 % |
| ERP, energy, payroll integrations | 4 to 6 weeks | 20 % |
| Dashboards and exports | 3 to 4 weeks | 13 % |
| Acceptance testing with the auditor, training | 2 weeks | 8 % |
Involve your auditor from the scoping phase: reviewing the audit trail design before development avoids rebuilding the traceability module after the first campaign.
Need a professional website?
Kolonell builds websites that attract clients, optimized for the Sénégalese market. Free quote in 2 minutes.
Mini case study
Sarah, sustainability director of a 1,400-employee industrial company in Amsterdam (illustrative scenario). Her team spends 35 person-days per collection campaign, at a loaded cost of 550 EUR per day, so 19,250 EUR per campaign, two campaigns a year: 38,500 EUR. The shortlisted off-the-shelf software quote comes to 42,000 EUR per year for 12 entities and 60 contributors.
She compares it with a custom platform at 78,000 EUR excl. VAT plus 9,000 EUR per year of maintenance. Collection time drops to 12 person-days per campaign, or 13,200 EUR per year. Over 5 years, the off-the-shelf software costs 210,000 EUR in licences plus 66,000 EUR of internal time, or 276,000 EUR. The custom option costs 78,000 + 45,000 + 66,000, or 189,000 EUR. The 87,000 EUR gap easily funds extending the platform to track the climate transition plan.
FAQ
Is an unlisted mid-sized company subject to the CSRD in 2026?
The timeline was pushed back by the 2025 Omnibus package: large second-wave companies, above 1,000 employees under the revised thresholds, will report on 2027 financial years. Preparing collection in 2026 leaves at least one dry-run campaign before the first audited report.
How many indicators really need to be collected?
The ESRS contain more than 1,000 datapoints, but a serious double materiality assessment usually retains 200 to 500. For an industrial company with 12 sites, 400 indicators is a realistic order of magnitude.
Can we start with off-the-shelf software and move to custom later?
Yes, provided the contract requires a full export of data and history in an open format from day one. Without that clause, migration can cost 10,000 to 20,000 EUR in rework.
What hosting is suitable for sustainability data?
Hosting in the Netherlands or elsewhere in the European Union, with daily backups and named accounts, is enough in most cases. Budget 150 to 600 EUR per month depending on volume and availability level.
How long does it take to train site contributors?
A 2-hour session per site and an entry guide are enough when forms are simple. Plan an internal help desk for the first 3 weeks of the first campaign.
Let's scope your project. Send us your list of sites, data sources and selected indicators: we will price a CSRD collection platform with workflow and audit trail, with an indicative budget and a 4 to 6 month plan. Detailed quote within 48 h. WhatsApp +221 77 596 93 33.
Mohamed Bah
Fondateur, Kolonell
Passionate about digital and entrepreneurship in Africa, Mohamed has been helping Sénégalese businesses with their digital transformation since 2020. Founder of Kolonell, he believes every SME deserves a professional and accessible online présence.

