The verdict in three sentences
The buy-vs-build decision is not about price alone: it turns on process specificity, competitive edge and 5-year TCO. Buying (SaaS) wins for standard needs, small teams and short horizons; building (custom) wins when the software IS the business, integrations run deep, or user count makes the subscription explode. The scoring grid and break-even curves below turn intuition into a defensible decision.
The decision criteria
Seven criteria drive the call. Each leans toward buy or build:
| Criterion | Leans BUY | Leans BUILD |
|---|---|---|
| Process specificity | industry standard | unique / differentiating |
| Competitive edge | mundane back-office | core business |
| User count | < 20 | > 50 |
| Integration depth | 1-2 connections | complex multi-source IS |
| Holding horizon | < 3 years | > 5 years |
| Pace of change | low | high, continuous |
| Vendor lock-in tolerated | yes | no (strategic IP) |
The break-even curves
Cumulative cost depends directly on user count. Example: SaaS at 60 EUR/user/month vs build at 90,000 EUR + 20 %/year maintenance.
| Users | SaaS / 5 years | Custom / 5 years | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 users | 36,000 EUR | 180,000 EUR | SaaS |
| 25 users | 90,000 EUR | 180,000 EUR | SaaS |
| 42 users | 151,200 EUR | 180,000 EUR | SaaS (barely) |
| 50 users | 180,000 EUR | 180,000 EUR | tie |
| 70 users | 252,000 EUR | 180,000 EUR | Custom |
| 100 users | 360,000 EUR | 180,000 EUR | Custom |
Break-even here lands at 50 users: below it, buy; above it, build, all else equal.
The scoring grid
Score each criterion 0 (clear buy) to 5 (clear build), weight, sum:
Need a professional website?
Kolonell builds websites that attract clients, optimized for the Sénégalese market. Free quote in 2 minutes.
| Criterion | Weight | Your score (0-5) |
|---|---|---|
| Process specificity | 25 % | ... |
| Competitive edge | 25 % | ... |
| User count | 20 % | ... |
| Integration depth | 15 % | ... |
| 5-year TCO | 15 % | ... |
Weighted score < 2 -> buy; 2 to 3.5 -> hybrid (SaaS + custom modules); > 3.5 -> build.
Mini case study
David is COO of a logistics-services firm in Marseille, 65 users. The SaaS in scope costs 65 EUR/user/month, or 50,700 EUR/year, and can't run his routing algorithm, his real differentiator. Over 5 years: 253,500 EUR of subscription, without owning the IP. A custom build at 110,000 EUR + 20 %/year maintenance totals 220,000 EUR over 5 years, with the proprietary algorithm and zero dependence. His weighted score reaches 3.8: he builds, saves 33,500 EUR and protects his competitive edge.
FAQ
Is buy-vs-build a binary choice? No, hybrid is often optimal: SaaS for the standard (payroll, accounting) and custom for the differentiating core. That's the answer for most middle scores.
How do I factor in speed? Buying ships in weeks, building in months. If time-to-market is critical, start on SaaS then internalize what becomes strategic.
Is vendor lock-in really a cost? Yes: it's paid in exit cost, imposed price hikes and refused evolutions. Quantify it in the 5-year TCO.
What if no SaaS covers 70 % of the need? That's a strong signal toward build or hybrid: workarounds on an ill-fitting SaaS often cost more than custom.
At what budget does custom make sense? Rarely below 50,000 EUR of build, but the real trigger is the 5-year TCO curve crossing, not an absolute threshold.
Let's scope your project. Give us your user count, differentiating processes and horizon: we'll produce your scoring grid and break-even curves. Detailed quote within 48 h. WhatsApp +221 77 596 93 33.
Mohamed Bah
Fondateur, Kolonell
Passionate about digital and entrepreneurship in Africa, Mohamed has been helping Sénégalese businesses with their digital transformation since 2020. Founder of Kolonell, he believes every SME deserves a professional and accessible online présence.
