Websites11 min read

WCAG Accessibility Retrofit for a Council Website in Amsterdam

Mohamed Bah·Fondateur, Kolonell
November 2, 2026
Share:
WCAG Accessibility Retrofit for a Council Website in Amsterdam

WCAG Accessibility Retrofit for a Council Website in Amsterdam

Websites

The verdict in three sentences

For a municipality in the Amsterdam region, bringing the website to WCAG 2.2 AA costs between EUR 15,500 and 48,000 excl. VAT: an audit of EUR 3,500 to 8,000 and fixes of EUR 12,000 to 40,000. The realistic timeline is 3 to 5 months, from audit to an updated statement on the national register. Doing nothing is riskier than ever: since the European Accessibility Act applies from June 2025, citizens and advocacy groups have more grounds to challenge inaccessible public services.

What Dutch rules require from a council in 2026

The Dutch Temporary Decree on Digital Accessibility for Government (Besluit digitale toegankelijkheid overheid) requires public bodies to meet EN 301 549, which references WCAG success criteria at level AA, and to publish a statement for every website and app.

ObligationExpected contentExposure if missing
Accessibility statementStatus A to E, known issues, contactPublic listing as non-compliant
Register entryStatement published on toegankelijkheidsverklaring.nlMonitoring by Logius
Recent auditEvaluation by an independent auditor, under 12 months for status A or BStatus downgraded
Improvement planDated measures for each open issueCouncil and press scrutiny
Feedback channelForm or address to report barriersComplaints from residents
Procurement clausesAccessibility required in every new contractRecurring non-compliance

WCAG 2.2 AA counts 55 success criteria across levels A and AA. Many audited public sites meet only around 45% of applicable criteria on first assessment, which typically yields status C or D.

Cost of a WCAG audit and fixes

The audit covers a sample of 10 to 20 representative pages: home, news, online services, forms, events, downloadable PDFs. Fix budgets depend mainly on the quality of the theme and the CMS.

ServiceScopeTimelineBudget (EUR, excl. VAT)
Quick scanPriority criteria, 10 pages1 week1,800 to 3,000
Full WCAG-EM audit55 criteria, 15 to 20 pages2 to 3 weeks3,500 to 8,000
Theme fixesContrast, keyboard navigation, structure3 to 6 weeks7,000 to 20,000
Form fixesLabels, errors, online services2 to 4 weeks3,000 to 10,000
PDF remediationCouncil decisions, newsletters, guidesvariable35 to 140 per document
Editor trainingAccessible writing, images, links1 to 2 days1,800 to 3,500
Re-audit and statementVerification, drafting, register update1 to 2 weeks1,800 to 4,000

The most overlooked item is PDFs. A council publishes hundreds of decisions: the sound strategy is to fix documents from the last 12 months and publish new ones as HTML wherever possible.

Typical 5-month timeline

MonthStepDeliverable
Month 1Full audit and prioritizationReport, baseline score, fix plan
Month 2Theme and template fixesKeyboard navigation, contrast, headings
Month 3Forms and online servicesCompliant forms, error messages
Month 4Priority PDFs and trainingRemediated documents, trained editors
Month 5Re-audit and publicationUpdated statement, improvement plan

A site on a recent, well-built CMS can be done in 3 months. An older site on a proprietary theme that cannot be fixed may justify a full rebuild, to assess from the audit report onward.

Mini case study

Need a professional website?

Kolonell builds websites that attract clients, optimized for the Sénégalese market. Free quote in 2 minutes.

Prefer a call back?

Leave your WhatsApp number and a Kolonell expert will get back to you within 1 business day. Free, no strings attached.

You are :

Eva, municipal secretary of a 45,000-resident municipality near Amsterdam, finds the site listed with status D on the register. The full audit, invoiced EUR 6,000, shows 38% of criteria met. The fix plan is priced at EUR 24,000, plus EUR 4,900 for 70 priority PDFs at EUR 70 each and EUR 2,400 of training.

Total project: EUR 37,300 over 5 months. The re-audit shows 82% of criteria met with a dated plan for the rest, and the statement moves to status B. Compared with a full rebuild estimated at EUR 80,000, the targeted retrofit saves about EUR 42,700 while giving the council a defensible position.

FAQ

What is the minimum time to publish a valid statement?

A statement requires a prior audit, so plan at least 3 weeks. You can publish a first statement with a low status, then update it after fixes, which quickly shows good faith.

Is a quick scan enough?

It helps prioritize, but statuses A and B require a full audit by an independent party. A quick scan at EUR 1,800 to 3,000 is useful as a diagnosis before a tender.

Do we need to rebuild the site to comply?

Not always. If the CMS and theme allow fixes, EUR 12,000 to 40,000 is usually enough, compared with EUR 60,000 to 110,000 for a rebuild.

Must all old PDFs be fixed?

No, archived documents not needed for active services can be exempted. Focus on documents from the last 12 months and those tied to online services.

What does keeping compliance cost?

Plan an annual re-audit of EUR 2,500 to 4,500 and training for new editors. Without that follow-up, scores often drop 10 to 20 points within a year.

Let's scope your project. We scope the WCAG audit, fixes and accessibility statement for your council, for an indicative budget of EUR 15,500 to 48,000 over 3 to 5 months. Detailed quote within 48 h. WhatsApp +221 77 596 93 33.

Tags:#accessibilité RGAA#site collectivité Strasbourg#audit accessibilité#déclaration d'accessibilité#WCAG retrofit#Amsterdam council website
Share:

Mohamed Bah

Fondateur, Kolonell

Passionate about digital and entrepreneurship in Africa, Mohamed has been helping Sénégalese businesses with their digital transformation since 2020. Founder of Kolonell, he believes every SME deserves a professional and accessible online présence.