The verdict in three sentences
For a Dublin surveying firm handling 1,200 projects a year, the real issue is leaking fees: roughly 8 % of work performed is never invoiced because nothing connects field crews, the drafting office and accounts. Off-the-shelf practice software at 100 to 250 EUR per user per month covers most needs if your processes are standard, while custom software linked to your GIS (30,000 to 60,000 EUR excl. VAT) makes sense once your work mixes boundary disputes, property registration maps and topographic surveys with their own approval steps. On 1.8 M EUR of revenue, recovering half of the lost fees pays for either option in under two years.
Where a surveying firm loses its fees
A boundary job goes through about ten steps: quote, notifying neighbours, field survey, computation, report, Tailte Éireann (Land Registry) compliant map, invoicing. Each step is a chance to forget an extra site visit, travel time or a redrawn map. In Dublin, topographic surveys for developers and Land Registry compliant mapping for conveyancing solicitors sit alongside measured building surveys, each billed in a different way.
| Project type | Typical annual volume | Average fee excl. VAT (2026 estimate) | Main source of leakage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boundary survey and report | 420 | 1,100 EUR | Extra neighbour meetings not recharged |
| Land Registry compliant map | 260 | 1,800 EUR | Redraws after registry queries |
| Measured building survey | 180 | 2,400 EUR | Back and forth with managing agents untracked |
| Topographic survey for developers | 220 | 2,900 EUR | Extra survey areas outside the quote |
| Setting out and as-built | 120 | 1,300 EUR | Repeat site visits forgotten |
| Total | 1,200 | Revenue around 1.8 M EUR | 8 % uninvoiced, i.e. 144,000 EUR |
The 8 % figure is a cautious estimate seen in firms still tracking jobs with spreadsheets and a shared calendar. One unrecorded field hour per project is enough to reach it.
Practice software or custom software linked to GIS
Off-the-shelf tools cover job management, timesheets and invoicing. They are built for a generic professional firm, though, and talk poorly with your CAD, your GIS (QGIS, ArcGIS) and your registry exports. Custom software starts from your real workflow and displays every job on a map with its billing status.
| Criterion | Practice software | Custom software linked to GIS |
|---|---|---|
| Upfront cost | 0 to 3,000 EUR of configuration | 30,000 to 60,000 EUR excl. VAT |
| Recurring cost | 100 to 250 EUR per user per month | Maintenance 400 to 900 EUR per month |
| 3-year cost, 14 users | 50,400 to 126,000 EUR | 44,400 to 92,400 EUR |
| Map of jobs and parcels | Rare or optional | Native, with registry and zoning layers |
| Alerts on uninvoiced fees | Basic (logged time) | Rules per project type and step |
| Time to go live | 2 to 6 weeks | 3 to 5 months |
| Ownership of code and data | Vendor | Firm |
For 14 users, high-end practice software and custom software end up at the same cost over three years. The deciding factor then becomes the share of non-standard jobs: above one third of jobs that do not fit the standard model, the workarounds recreate the very leakage you wanted to remove.
What a good tool must lock in from version 1
Whatever the option, insist on four mechanisms. First, mobile field time entry that works offline, because rural surveys in Wicklow or Meath often lack coverage. Second, a billing status per step that blocks closing a job until each visit is invoiced or explicitly written off. Third, a dashboard of unbilled work in progress per director. Fourth, clean exports to your accounting package and to your registry mapping workflow to avoid double entry.
Mini case study
Need a professional website?
Kolonell builds websites that attract clients, optimized for the Sénégalese market. Free quote in 2 minutes.
Aoife, director of a 14-person surveying firm in Dublin, estimates her losses at 144,000 EUR a year. She opts for custom software at 48,000 EUR excl. VAT, with 650 EUR of monthly maintenance. The realistic first-year target is to recover half of the lost fees, i.e. 72,000 EUR. First-year cost: 48,000 + 7,800 = 55,800 EUR. Net gain in year one: 16,200 EUR, then about 64,200 EUR per year afterwards. With practice software at 180 EUR per user, the annual cost would be 30,240 EUR, but Aoife estimates it would only capture 40 % of the losses for lack of rules suited to measured surveys: 57,600 EUR recovered, a net gain of 27,360 EUR a year. Over three years, custom software delivers 144,600 EUR of net gain against 82,080 EUR.
FAQ
How much does surveying practice software cost in 2026?
Expect 100 to 250 EUR per user per month for practice software, or 30,000 to 60,000 EUR excl. VAT for a custom build linked to GIS. Over three years and for 14 users, both options land between 45,000 and 125,000 EUR.
Can the software connect to QGIS or ArcGIS?
Yes, a custom tool can read and write layers in GeoPackage format or through a WFS service. It then shows each job on the map with its status, which usually takes 10 to 15 days of development.
How do we measure our uninvoiced fees before deciding?
Take 50 closed jobs and compare the time actually spent with the amounts invoiced. If the gap exceeds 5 %, a tracking tool usually pays for itself in under 24 months.
How long does implementation take?
Practice software is configured in 2 to 6 weeks. Custom software needs 3 to 5 months, including 3 to 4 weeks of migrating live jobs and training.
Does our data stay in the EU?
With a custom build, you choose the host, for example an EU region of a major cloud provider. For practice software, check the server location in the contract, a key GDPR point.
Let's scope your project. Send us your job volume, number of users and current GIS tools, and we will price a scope, an indicative budget and a realistic timeline. Detailed quote within 48 h. WhatsApp +221 77 596 93 33.
Mohamed Bah
Fondateur, Kolonell
Passionate about digital and entrepreneurship in Africa, Mohamed has been helping Sénégalese businesses with their digital transformation since 2020. Founder of Kolonell, he believes every SME deserves a professional and accessible online présence.
