The verdict in three sentences
For a private higher education provider in London processing 6,000 applications a year, a custom admissions platform costs, as a 2026 order of magnitude, between £40,000 and £110,000 excluding VAT, with go-live in 12 to 16 weeks. The clearest gain is a reduction of around 70% in processing time, driven by online document upload, automatic completeness checks and a digital selection panel. Compared with extending a full student information system such as Tribal SITS or Ellucian, a focused platform is usually cheaper over three years, as long as the applicant journey is scoped before any code is written.
What the platform has to cover
A registrar does not need just another web form. The tool must follow each application end to end: applicant account, choice of programme and intake, academic history, upload of transcripts, passport, English language certificates and references, then staff review, optional interview, panel decision and offer letter. Every step needs a timestamped audit trail, because appeals, Office for Students conditions and UKVI sponsor compliance all depend on being able to show who decided what, and when.
Three points matter in the London market. First, application fees and deposits collected online by card through a provider such as Stripe or Worldpay, with automatic reconciliation. Second, UK GDPR: a documented lawful basis, a defined retention period for unsuccessful applicants and an entry in your records of processing, with the ICO as regulator. Third, international applicants, often 30 to 60% of a private provider's intake, who need CAS-ready data, document verification and payment options from abroad, including mobile money for West African applicants via Wave or Orange Money.
| Module | Main function | Share of budget (2026 order of magnitude) |
|---|---|---|
| Applicant portal and programme forms | Account, guided entry, drafts, saved progress | 15 to 20% |
| Document upload and checks | Format and size rules, completeness checks | 12 to 15% |
| Review workflow | Assignment to staff, statuses, automatic chasers | 15 to 20% |
| Online selection panel | Scoring grid, comments, exported minutes | 10 to 15% |
| Fee and deposit payments | Card gateway, receipts, reconciliation | 8 to 10% |
| Email and SMS notifications | Acknowledgements, missing documents, decisions | 5% |
| Dashboard and SIS export | Conversion by programme, export to the student record system | 10 to 15% |
2026 cost ranges in London, and how they compare with SIS products
Budget depends on the number of programmes with distinct entry rules, panel complexity and integration with the existing student record system. A single-site provider with a dozen courses sits at the low end; a multi-campus group recruiting internationally with video interviews sits at the top.
| Option | Scope | Cost (2026 order of magnitude) | Lead time |
|---|---|---|---|
| Custom, Essential | Applications, documents, fees, notifications | £40,000 to £55,000 | 12 weeks |
| Custom, Standard | Essential plus online panel, scoring, dashboard | £55,000 to £75,000 | 14 weeks |
| Custom, Advanced | Standard plus multi-campus, interviews, SIS export, CAS data | £75,000 to £110,000 | 16 weeks |
| SIS admissions module (Tribal SITS, Ellucian) | Licence plus implementation partner | £40,000 to £150,000 per year plus setup | 6 to 12 months |
| Admissions CRM SaaS (Slate, Salesforce Education Cloud) | Licence, configuration, partner fees | £25,000 to £90,000 per year | 4 to 9 months |
| Generic form tool and email | No completeness checks, no panel, double entry remains | £2,000 to £6,000 | 2 weeks |
SIS suites are powerful but sized for universities with tens of thousands of students; a private provider often pays for modules it will never use, plus a recurring licence. A custom platform that exports cleanly into the existing record system keeps data ownership in-house and usually breaks even against a licence within two to three cycles.
Where the 70% time saving comes from
The figure can be rebuilt step by step. Applicants enter their own data, the platform refuses incomplete files and chases automatically, and panel members read a summary sheet instead of passing PDFs around by email.
| Step | Email and paper (minutes) | Platform (minutes) |
|---|---|---|
| Receipt and logging | 10 | 1 |
| Completeness check | 9 | 3 |
| Chasing missing documents | 7 | 1 |
| Academic review | 8 | 6 |
| Panel preparation | 3 | 0.5 |
| Decision and offer letter | 2 | 0.5 |
| Fee reconciliation | 1 | 0 |
| Total per application | 40 | 12 |
Academic review stays human and almost unchanged, which is the point: the platform removes administration, not academic judgement.
Need a professional website?
Kolonell builds websites that attract clients, optimized for the Sénégalese market. Free quote in 2 minutes.
Mini case study
Helen, registrar of a private business school in London, handles 6,000 applications per cycle with a team of six. At 40 minutes per file, that is 4,000 hours; with the platform, at 12 minutes, it falls to 1,200 hours. The 2,800 hours saved, at a loaded cost of £22 per hour, are worth £61,600 a year. Printing, courier for original documents and archiving add about £2 per file, or £12,000. Annual benefit: £73,600. With a Standard build at £65,000 and support at £8,000 a year, payback arrives in roughly 12 months, inside the first full cycle, before counting the international applicants who used to drop out at the payment step.
FAQ
When should we start to be live for the September intake?
International recruitment opens in the autumn of the previous year, so a 14-week build plus 2 weeks of testing means starting scoping in June. Starting in January forces you to the Essential scope for that cycle.
Does this replace UCAS?
No. Undergraduate applications through UCAS still arrive via UCAS; the platform handles direct, postgraduate and international applications, which often represent 50% or more of a private provider's volume, and can import UCAS data files.
What does UK GDPR require for applicant data?
A lawful basis, role-based access, a retention period such as 12 months for unsuccessful applicants and access logs. A DPIA, typically £1,500 to £4,000 if outsourced, is advisable when processing passports and health or disability information.
Can overseas applicants pay fees from Africa or Asia?
Yes. Cards cover most cases, and adding Wave or Orange Money for West African applicants removes a frequent drop-out point; providers recruiting 20% from that region see the clearest effect.
Is a hybrid first year sensible?
Yes: plan for 10 to 15% of applications arriving by email or post and keyed in by staff. By the second cycle this usually falls below 5%.
Let's scope your project. Tell us your programmes, application volume and next intake date, and we will scope the platform and timeline with you. Detailed quote within 48 h. WhatsApp +221 77 596 93 33.
Mohamed Bah
Fondateur, Kolonell
Passionate about digital and entrepreneurship in Africa, Mohamed has been helping Sénégalese businesses with their digital transformation since 2020. Founder of Kolonell, he believes every SME deserves a professional and accessible online présence.