The verdict in three sentences
A public-sector website RFP is won on the technical score, not the lowest price: a typical municipal weighting is 40% technical, 30% price, 30% references. Two requirements are pass/fail in 2026: WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility and Canadian data residency. Planning the exit clause and regulatory timeline avoids irregular bids that get rejected unread.
The scoring grid of a public tender
The RFP document fixes the criteria and their weight. Here is a representative split for a mid-sized municipal website (2026 order of magnitude).
| Criterion | Weight | Scored sub-criteria | Scale |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technical value | 40% | UX, accessibility, security | 0-20 |
| Price | 30% | Inverse linear formula | 0-20 |
| References | 30% | Comparable public projects | 0-20 |
| WCAG accessibility | Pass/fail | Conformance > 75% | Yes/No |
| Hosting | Pass/fail | Canadian residency | Yes/No |
The price score uses an inverse formula: score = 20 x (lowest price / bid price). A 20% price gap costs only a few points; a technical weakness costs many more. Bid on value, not on discount.
Budget, timelines and clauses to anticipate
A municipal website in Toronto typically costs between CAD 60,000 and 180,000 depending on scope (citizen portal, online services, multilingual). Timelines are framed by procurement rules.
| Element | 2026 range | Watch point |
|---|---|---|
| Brochure + CMS | CAD 60,000-100,000 | Accessibility included |
| Portal with services | CAD 120,000-180,000 | Interoperability/SSO |
| Minimum response time | 30 days | Don't rush the bid |
| Contract term | 3-4 years (maintenance) | Exit at end |
| Reversibility | Export within 30 days | Cost it in the bid |
| Late penalties | ~0.1%/day | Negotiate the cap |
The reversibility clause obliges the vendor to hand back data, code and documentation at contract end: cost it, or it becomes a hidden charge. Confirm the data residency requirement (Canadian-hosted, sometimes certified).
Mini case study
David, procurement lead for a regional agency near Toronto, launches a CAD 130,000 tender for a citizen portal. Three agencies bid: CAD 108,000, 126,000 and 144,000. The lowest bidder scores 20/20 on price but 11/20 on technical (no formal accessibility audit). The CAD 126,000 agency, scoring 18/20 technical and 17/20 references, wins: overall score 17.5/20 vs 15.1/20. The CAD 18,000 premium buys WCAG conformance and avoids an accessibility rework estimated at CAD 38,000.
Need a professional website?
Kolonell builds websites that attract clients, optimized for the Sénégalese market. Free quote in 2 minutes.
FAQ
Does the lowest price always win a public tender?
No: with 40% technical weight, a bid 15% more expensive but technically superior often wins. The price formula flattens the gap; technical value widens it.
What does WCAG 2.1 AA require concretely?
A measurable conformance level across dozens of accessibility criteria, with a published statement and audit. Non-conformance can make a bid irregular.
Is Canadian data residency mandatory?
For many public bodies, yes: data hosted in Canada, sometimes with certification. A non-Canadian host can disqualify the bid.
How do I cost reversibility?
Budget 3-6 person-days for the documented export of content, code and access. List it as an option so contract end holds no surprises.
Can you bid without public references?
Yes, but the 30% references weight is heavy: offset with comparable private projects and a proven team. Partnering with a referenced firm helps.
Let's scope your project. Public tender response, citizen portal or institutional site, indicative budget CAD 60,000-180,000, WCAG 2.1 AA and data residency: we build the technical memo and pricing. Detailed quote within 48 h. WhatsApp +221 77 596 93 33.
Mohamed Bah
Fondateur, Kolonell
Passionate about digital and entrepreneurship in Africa, Mohamed has been helping Sénégalese businesses with their digital transformation since 2020. Founder of Kolonell, he believes every SME deserves a professional and accessible online présence.
